Belarus vs China: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Belarus
1
in 2018
China
1
in 2018
Belarus rank
117th
China rank
117th

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Belarus
  • China
0123180019092018

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 1 against 1 in China, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 205 shared years of data; in 1800 it was China ahead.

Belarus ranks 117th and China ranks 117th of 166 countries.

Across the 22 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus China Difference Ahead
1800s 1 1 0 β€”
1810s 1 1 0 β€”
1820s 1 1 0 β€”
1830s 1 1 0 β€”
1840s 1 1 0 β€”
1850s 1 1 0 β€”
1860s 1 1 0 β€”
1870s 1 1 0 β€”
1880s 1 1 0 β€”
1890s 1 1 0 β€”
1900s 1 1 0 β€”
1910s 0.625 0.875 0.25 China
1920s 0.8 1 0.2 China
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1.8 1 0.8 Belarus
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Belarus or China?
Belarus, at 1 against 1 in China as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Belarus and China?
0, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China?
205 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2018.
How do Belarus and China rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Belarus ranks 117th and China ranks 117th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).