Bangladesh vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Bangladesh
1
in 2018
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1
in 1991
Bangladesh rank
118th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
118th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 1 against 1 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 118th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1990s | 1.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Bangladesh or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Bangladesh, at 1 against 1 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Bangladesh and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 1991.
- How do Bangladesh and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Bangladesh ranks 118th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).