Austria vs Slovakia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Austria
3
in 2018
Slovakia
3
in 2018
Austria rank
1st
Slovakia rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Austria
- Slovakia
How they compare
Austria currently reports 3 against 3 in Slovakia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 89 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Slovakia ahead.
Austria ranks 1st and Slovakia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 6 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1.86 | 3 | 1.14 | Slovakia |
| 1940s | 3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | Austria |
| 1950s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Austria |
| 1960s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Austria |
| 1970s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Austria |
| 1980s | 3 | 1.1 | 1.9 | Austria |
| 1990s | 3 | 2.7 | 0.3 | Austria |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Austria or Slovakia?
- Austria, at 3 against 3 in Slovakia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Austria and Slovakia?
- 0, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Slovakia?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2018.
- How do Austria and Slovakia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Austria ranks 1st and Slovakia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).