Austria vs Peru: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Austria
3
in 2018
Peru
3
in 2018
Austria rank
1st
Peru rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Austria
  • Peru
0123180019092018

How they compare

Austria currently reports 3 against 3 in Peru, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 175 shared years of data; in 1821 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 20 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 10 and Peru in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Peru Difference Ahead
1820s 1 1.6 0.6 Peru
1830s 1 1.5 0.5 Peru
1840s 1 0 1 Austria
1850s 1 0 1 Austria
1860s 1 0 1 Austria
1870s 1 0 1 Austria
1880s 1 1.5 0.5 Peru
1890s 1 3 2 Peru
1900s 1 3 2 Peru
1910s 1 3 2 Peru
1920s 3 1 2 Austria
1930s 1 3 2 Peru
1940s 3 1.5 1.5 Austria
1950s 3 0.8 2.2 Austria
1960s 3 2 1 Austria
1970s 3 0 3 Austria
1980s 3 3 0
1990s 3 0.6 2.4 Austria
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Austria or Peru?
Austria, at 3 against 3 in Peru as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Austria and Peru?
0, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Peru?
175 years are reported by both, from 1821 to 2018.
How do Austria and Peru rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Austria ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).