Austria vs Canada: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Austria
3
in 2018
Canada
3
in 2018
Austria rank
1st
Canada rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Austria
- Canada
How they compare
Austria currently reports 3 against 3 in Canada, a difference of 0.
Across all 141 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 1st and Canada ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Canada |
| 1870s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Canada |
| 1880s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Canada |
| 1890s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Canada |
| 1900s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Canada |
| 1910s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Canada |
| 1920s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1.86 | 3 | 1.14 | Canada |
| 1940s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Austria or Canada?
- Austria, at 3 against 3 in Canada as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Austria and Canada?
- 0, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Canada?
- 141 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2018.
- How do Austria and Canada rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Austria ranks 1st and Canada ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).