Australia vs Mongolia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Australia
3
in 2018
Mongolia
3
in 2018
Australia rank
1st
Mongolia rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Australia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 3 against 3 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 95 shared years of data; in 1924 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Australia |
| 1930s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Australia |
| 1940s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Australia |
| 1950s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Australia |
| 1960s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Australia |
| 1970s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Australia |
| 1980s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Australia |
| 1990s | 3 | 2.8 | 0.2 | Australia |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Australia or Mongolia?
- Australia, at 3 against 3 in Mongolia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Australia and Mongolia?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mongolia?
- 95 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Mongolia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Australia ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).