Australia vs Denmark: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Australia
3
in 2018
Denmark
3
in 2018
Australia rank
1st
Denmark rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Australia
  • Denmark
11.522.53180019092018

How they compare

Australia currently reports 3 against 3 in Denmark, a difference of 0.

Across all 99 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 1st and Denmark ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Denmark Difference Ahead
1910s 3 3 0 β€”
1920s 3 3 0 β€”
1930s 3 3 0 β€”
1940s 3 3 0 β€”
1950s 3 3 0 β€”
1960s 3 3 0 β€”
1970s 3 3 0 β€”
1980s 3 3 0 β€”
1990s 3 3 0 β€”
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Australia or Denmark?
Australia, at 3 against 3 in Denmark as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Australia and Denmark?
0, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Denmark?
99 years are reported by both, from 1915 to 2018.
How do Australia and Denmark rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Australia ranks 1st and Denmark ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).