Albania vs Chile: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Albania
3
in 2018
Chile
3
in 2018
Albania rank
1st
Chile rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Albania
- Chile
How they compare
Albania currently reports 3 against 3 in Chile, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 87 shared years of data; in 1914 it was Chile ahead.
Albania ranks 1st and Chile ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 3 and Chile in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1.44 | 0.4444 | Chile |
| 1940s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Chile |
| 1950s | 1 | 2.2 | 1.2 | Chile |
| 1960s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Chile |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Albania |
| 1980s | 1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | Albania |
| 1990s | 2.33 | 2 | 0.3333 | Albania |
| 2000s | 2.5 | 3 | 0.5 | Chile |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Albania or Chile?
- Albania, at 3 against 3 in Chile as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Albania and Chile?
- 0, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Chile?
- 87 years are reported by both, from 1914 to 2018.
- How do Albania and Chile rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Albania ranks 1st and Chile ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).