Aruba vs Myanmar: Comparative advantage in environmental goods
Comparative advantage in environmental goods over time
- Aruba
- Myanmar
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.037 index against 0.0349 index in Myanmar, a difference of 0.0021 index.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 143rd and Myanmar ranks 145th of 163 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher comparative advantage in environmental goods, Aruba or Myanmar?
- Aruba, at 0.037 index against 0.0349 index in Myanmar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in comparative advantage in environmental goods between Aruba and Myanmar?
- 0.0021 index, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Myanmar?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Aruba and Myanmar rank globally for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
- Aruba ranks 143rd and Myanmar ranks 145th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protection—such as goods related to pollution management and resource management—and adapted goods—which are goods that have been specifically modified to be more “environmentally friendly” or “cleaner.” Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protection—such as goods related to pollution management and resource management—and adapted goods—which are goods that have been specifically modified to be more “environmentally friendly” or “cleaner.” A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.