Ukraine vs Uruguay: Common Good Justifications Score
Ukraine
2.58
in 2025
Uruguay
2.95
in 2025
Ukraine rank
4th
Uruguay rank
1st
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Ukraine
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 2.95 against 2.58 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.37.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Ukraine's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Ukraine ahead.
Ukraine ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 1st of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Ukraine averaged higher in 8 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ukraine | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0.836 | 0.259 | 0.577 | Ukraine |
| 1950s | 0.8468 | 0.259 | 0.5878 | Ukraine |
| 1960s | 0.854 | 0.1492 | 0.7048 | Ukraine |
| 1970s | 0.854 | -1.01 | 1.87 | Ukraine |
| 1980s | 1.26 | -0.2936 | 1.55 | Ukraine |
| 1990s | 1.63 | 0.515 | 1.11 | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 1.54 | 1.27 | 0.2686 | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 1.35 | 1.93 | 0.5813 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 2.56 | 1.79 | 0.7733 | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Ukraine or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 2.95 against 2.58 in Ukraine as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Ukraine and Uruguay?
- 0.37, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ukraine and Uruguay?
- 80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
- How do Ukraine and Uruguay rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Ukraine ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 1st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.