Peru vs Uganda: Common Good Justifications Score
Peru
0.395
in 2025
Uganda
0.368
in 2025
Peru rank
112th
Uganda rank
114th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Peru
- Uganda
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.395 against 0.368 in Uganda, a difference of 0.027.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 112th and Uganda ranks 114th of 175 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.251 | -2.55 | 2.8 | Peru |
| 1910s | 0.251 | -2.55 | 2.8 | Peru |
| 1920s | 0.251 | -2.55 | 2.8 | Peru |
| 1930s | 0.251 | -2.55 | 2.8 | Peru |
| 1940s | 0.251 | -2.55 | 2.8 | Peru |
| 1950s | 0.154 | -2.45 | 2.6 | Peru |
| 1960s | 0.2692 | -1.25 | 1.52 | Peru |
| 1970s | 0.7925 | -2.22 | 3.01 | Peru |
| 1980s | 2.02 | -0.5014 | 2.52 | Peru |
| 1990s | 2.1 | 0.26 | 1.84 | Peru |
| 2000s | 2.07 | 0.26 | 1.81 | Peru |
| 2010s | 1.81 | 0.3424 | 1.47 | Peru |
| 2020s | 0.8343 | 0.3095 | 0.5248 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Peru or Uganda?
- Peru, at 0.395 against 0.368 in Uganda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Peru and Uganda?
- 0.027, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Uganda?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Peru and Uganda rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Peru ranks 112th and Uganda ranks 114th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.