Niger vs Ukraine: Common Good Justifications Score
Niger
2.43
in 2025
Ukraine
2.58
in 2025
Niger rank
7th
Ukraine rank
4th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Niger
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 2.58 against 2.43 in Niger, a difference of 0.15.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.1 times Niger's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Ukraine ahead.
Niger ranks 7th and Ukraine ranks 4th of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -2.65 | 0.836 | 3.49 | Ukraine |
| 1950s | -2.45 | 0.8468 | 3.3 | Ukraine |
| 1960s | 0.467 | 0.854 | 0.387 | Ukraine |
| 1970s | 0.3735 | 0.854 | 0.4805 | Ukraine |
| 1980s | 0.28 | 1.26 | 0.9794 | Ukraine |
| 1990s | 0.9292 | 1.63 | 0.698 | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 0.9522 | 1.54 | 0.5892 | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 1.55 | 1.35 | 0.1924 | Niger |
| 2020s | 1.86 | 2.56 | 0.7007 | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Niger or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 2.58 against 2.43 in Niger as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Niger and Ukraine?
- 0.15, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Ukraine?
- 80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
- How do Niger and Ukraine rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Niger ranks 7th and Ukraine ranks 4th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.