Niger vs Tunisia: Common Good Justifications Score
Niger
2.43
in 2025
Tunisia
2.37
in 2025
Niger rank
7th
Tunisia rank
8th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Niger
- Tunisia
How they compare
Niger currently reports 2.43 against 2.37 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Tunisia ahead.
Niger ranks 7th and Tunisia ranks 8th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 10.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | -2.65 | -1.33 | 1.32 | Tunisia |
| 1930s | -2.65 | -1.33 | 1.32 | Tunisia |
| 1940s | -2.65 | -1.33 | 1.32 | Tunisia |
| 1950s | -2.45 | 0.4496 | 2.9 | Tunisia |
| 1960s | 0.467 | 2.82 | 2.35 | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 0.3735 | 2.25 | 1.88 | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 0.28 | 2.06 | 1.78 | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 0.9292 | 1.53 | 0.6048 | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.9522 | 0.9402 | 0.012 | Niger |
| 2010s | 1.55 | 2.02 | 0.473 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 1.86 | 2.37 | 0.5043 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Niger or Tunisia?
- Niger, at 2.43 against 2.37 in Tunisia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Niger and Tunisia?
- 0.06, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Tunisia?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Niger and Tunisia rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Niger ranks 7th and Tunisia ranks 8th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.