Niger vs Norway: Common Good Justifications Score
Niger
2.43
in 2025
Norway
2.36
in 2025
Niger rank
7th
Norway rank
9th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Niger
- Norway
How they compare
Niger currently reports 2.43 against 2.36 in Norway, a difference of 0.07.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Norway ahead.
Niger ranks 7th and Norway ranks 9th of 175 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | -2.65 | 0.286 | 2.94 | Norway |
| 1930s | -2.65 | 0.2758 | 2.93 | Norway |
| 1940s | -2.65 | 0.5984 | 3.25 | Norway |
| 1950s | -2.45 | 2 | 4.45 | Norway |
| 1960s | 0.467 | 2.05 | 1.58 | Norway |
| 1970s | 0.3735 | 2.05 | 1.67 | Norway |
| 1980s | 0.28 | 2.05 | 1.77 | Norway |
| 1990s | 0.9292 | 2.05 | 1.12 | Norway |
| 2000s | 0.9522 | 2.05 | 1.1 | Norway |
| 2010s | 1.55 | 2.02 | 0.4747 | Norway |
| 2020s | 1.86 | 2.13 | 0.2688 | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Niger or Norway?
- Niger, at 2.43 against 2.36 in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Niger and Norway?
- 0.07, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Norway?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Niger and Norway rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Niger ranks 7th and Norway ranks 9th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.