Nepal vs Turkey: Common Good Justifications Score
Nepal
0.257
in 2025
Turkey
0.104
in 2025
Nepal rank
122nd
Turkey rank
124th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Nepal
- Turkey
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0.257 against 0.104 in Turkey, a difference of 0.153.
That makes Nepal's figure about 2.5 times Turkey's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Turkey ahead.
Nepal ranks 122nd and Turkey ranks 124th of 175 countries.
Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -3.19 | 0.291 | 3.48 | Turkey |
| 1910s | -3.19 | 0.3525 | 3.54 | Turkey |
| 1920s | -3.19 | 2.46 | 5.65 | Turkey |
| 1930s | -3.19 | 3.16 | 6.35 | Turkey |
| 1940s | -3.19 | 2.73 | 5.92 | Turkey |
| 1950s | -1.01 | 0.702 | 1.71 | Turkey |
| 1960s | -1.23 | 0.8796 | 2.11 | Turkey |
| 1970s | -1.38 | 1.07 | 2.45 | Turkey |
| 1980s | -1.38 | 1.4 | 2.78 | Turkey |
| 1990s | -0.3844 | 0.608 | 0.9924 | Turkey |
| 2000s | -0.9907 | 1.03 | 2.02 | Turkey |
| 2010s | -0.6972 | 0.4585 | 1.16 | Turkey |
| 2020s | -0.032 | 0.1085 | 0.1405 | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Nepal or Turkey?
- Nepal, at 0.257 against 0.104 in Turkey as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Nepal and Turkey?
- 0.153, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Turkey?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Nepal and Turkey rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Nepal ranks 122nd and Turkey ranks 124th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.