Mexico vs East Timor: Common Good Justifications Score
Mexico
1.18
in 2025
East Timor
1.19
in 2025
Mexico rank
56th
East Timor rank
53rd
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Mexico
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 1.19 against 1.18 in Mexico, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 56th and East Timor ranks 53rd of 175 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.558 | -3.35 | 2.79 | Mexico |
| 1910s | 0.2358 | -3.35 | 3.58 | Mexico |
| 1920s | 0.6287 | -3.35 | 3.98 | Mexico |
| 1930s | 1.1 | -3.35 | 4.45 | Mexico |
| 1940s | 1.1 | -3.35 | 4.45 | Mexico |
| 1950s | 1.1 | -3.35 | 4.45 | Mexico |
| 1960s | 1.1 | -3.35 | 4.45 | Mexico |
| 1970s | 1.1 | -3.35 | 4.45 | Mexico |
| 1980s | 0.9283 | -3.35 | 4.28 | Mexico |
| 1990s | 0.911 | -3.35 | 4.26 | Mexico |
| 2000s | 1.43 | 0.557 | 0.8706 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 1.33 | 0.6342 | 0.6964 | Mexico |
| 2020s | 1.29 | 1.09 | 0.2062 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Mexico or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 1.19 against 1.18 in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Mexico and East Timor?
- 0.01, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and East Timor?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Mexico and East Timor rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Mexico ranks 56th and East Timor ranks 53rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.