Luxembourg vs Niger: Common Good Justifications Score
Luxembourg
2.48
in 2025
Niger
2.43
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
6th
Niger rank
7th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Luxembourg
- Niger
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 2.48 against 2.43 in Niger, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 6th and Niger ranks 7th of 175 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 1.6 | -2.65 | 4.25 | Luxembourg |
| 1930s | 1.6 | -2.65 | 4.25 | Luxembourg |
| 1940s | -0.0906 | -2.65 | 2.56 | Luxembourg |
| 1950s | 2.14 | -2.45 | 4.59 | Luxembourg |
| 1960s | 2.14 | 0.467 | 1.67 | Luxembourg |
| 1970s | 2.14 | 0.3735 | 1.77 | Luxembourg |
| 1980s | 2.14 | 0.28 | 1.86 | Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 2.14 | 0.9292 | 1.21 | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 2.14 | 0.9522 | 1.19 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 2.14 | 1.55 | 0.5948 | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 2.31 | 1.86 | 0.4468 | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Luxembourg or Niger?
- Luxembourg, at 2.48 against 2.43 in Niger as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Luxembourg and Niger?
- 0.05, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Niger?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Luxembourg and Niger rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Luxembourg ranks 6th and Niger ranks 7th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.