Liberia vs Libya: Common Good Justifications Score
Liberia
0.619
in 2025
Libya
0.617
in 2025
Liberia rank
94th
Libya rank
95th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Liberia
- Libya
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 0.619 against 0.617 in Libya, a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Liberia ahead.
Liberia ranks 94th and Libya ranks 95th of 175 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 7 and Libya in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | -0.085 | -3.41 | 3.33 | Liberia |
| 1940s | -0.085 | -3.41 | 3.33 | Liberia |
| 1950s | -0.065 | 0.206 | 0.271 | Libya |
| 1960s | -0.065 | 0.2284 | 0.2934 | Libya |
| 1970s | 0.9548 | 0.753 | 0.2018 | Liberia |
| 1980s | 0.7042 | 0.753 | 0.0488 | Libya |
| 1990s | 0.9243 | 0.753 | 0.1713 | Liberia |
| 2000s | 1.08 | 0.753 | 0.3307 | Liberia |
| 2010s | 1.35 | 0.3291 | 1.02 | Liberia |
| 2020s | 1.29 | 0.4367 | 0.856 | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Liberia or Libya?
- Liberia, at 0.619 against 0.617 in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Liberia and Libya?
- 0.002, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Libya?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Liberia and Libya rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Liberia ranks 94th and Libya ranks 95th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.