Latvia vs Togo: Common Good Justifications Score
Latvia
0.85
in 2025
Togo
0.831
in 2025
Latvia rank
82nd
Togo rank
85th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Latvia
- Togo
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.85 against 0.831 in Togo, a difference of 0.019.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 82nd and Togo ranks 85th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 11 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.0457 | -1.93 | 1.97 | Latvia |
| 1920s | 1.12 | -1.93 | 3.05 | Latvia |
| 1930s | 0.6716 | -1.93 | 2.6 | Latvia |
| 1940s | 0.821 | -1.33 | 2.15 | Latvia |
| 1950s | 0.8468 | -0.6934 | 1.54 | Latvia |
| 1960s | 0.854 | -0.1854 | 1.04 | Latvia |
| 1970s | 0.854 | 0.005 | 0.849 | Latvia |
| 1980s | 1.26 | 0.005 | 1.25 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 0.6613 | 0.3114 | 0.3499 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.3272 | 0.6911 | 0.3639 | Togo |
| 2010s | 1.1 | 0.9338 | 0.1626 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 1.06 | 0.831 | 0.2257 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Latvia or Togo?
- Latvia, at 0.85 against 0.831 in Togo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Latvia and Togo?
- 0.019, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Togo?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Togo rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Latvia ranks 82nd and Togo ranks 85th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.