Laos vs Lebanon: Common Good Justifications Score
Laos
-0.217
in 2025
Lebanon
-0.273
in 2025
Laos rank
135th
Lebanon rank
136th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Laos
- Lebanon
How they compare
Laos currently reports -0.217 against -0.273 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.056.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Lebanon ahead.
Laos ranks 135th and Lebanon ranks 136th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 6 and Lebanon in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -3.55 | -0.979 | 2.57 | Lebanon |
| 1920s | -3.55 | -0.979 | 2.57 | Lebanon |
| 1930s | -3.55 | -0.979 | 2.57 | Lebanon |
| 1940s | -2.72 | -1.19 | 1.52 | Lebanon |
| 1950s | -1.52 | -1.27 | 0.2542 | Lebanon |
| 1960s | -1.52 | -1.1 | 0.4211 | Lebanon |
| 1970s | -0.6033 | -0.976 | 0.3727 | Laos |
| 1980s | 0.598 | -1.13 | 1.73 | Laos |
| 1990s | 0.598 | -0.4446 | 1.04 | Laos |
| 2000s | 0.598 | -0.445 | 1.04 | Laos |
| 2010s | 0.716 | -0.2292 | 0.9452 | Laos |
| 2020s | 0.1178 | -0.3363 | 0.4542 | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Laos or Lebanon?
- Laos, at -0.217 against -0.273 in Lebanon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Laos and Lebanon?
- 0.056, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Lebanon?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Laos and Lebanon rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Laos ranks 135th and Lebanon ranks 136th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.