Jordan vs Kenya: Common Good Justifications Score
Jordan
0.882
in 2025
Kenya
0.863
in 2025
Jordan rank
77th
Kenya rank
80th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Jordan
- Kenya
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.882 against 0.863 in Kenya, a difference of 0.019.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 77th and Kenya ranks 80th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 5 and Kenya in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | -0.598 | -1.82 | 1.22 | Jordan |
| 1930s | -0.598 | -1.82 | 1.22 | Jordan |
| 1940s | -0.598 | -1.74 | 1.14 | Jordan |
| 1950s | -0.3444 | -1.48 | 1.13 | Jordan |
| 1960s | -0.281 | -0.5233 | 0.2423 | Jordan |
| 1970s | -0.281 | 0.017 | 0.298 | Kenya |
| 1980s | -0.281 | 0.1874 | 0.4684 | Kenya |
| 1990s | -0.1863 | 0.548 | 0.7343 | Kenya |
| 2000s | 0.666 | 0.7554 | 0.0894 | Kenya |
| 2010s | 0.5341 | 0.8641 | 0.33 | Kenya |
| 2020s | 0.2023 | 0.8453 | 0.643 | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Jordan or Kenya?
- Jordan, at 0.882 against 0.863 in Kenya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Jordan and Kenya?
- 0.019, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Kenya?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Kenya rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Jordan ranks 77th and Kenya ranks 80th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.