Jamaica vs Russia: Common Good Justifications Score
Jamaica
1.44
in 2025
Russia
1.4
in 2025
Jamaica rank
39th
Russia rank
40th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Jamaica
- Russia
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 1.44 against 1.4 in Russia, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Russia ahead.
Jamaica ranks 39th and Russia ranks 40th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 12.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.119 | 0.052 | 0.171 | Russia |
| 1910s | -0.119 | 0.0495 | 0.1685 | Russia |
| 1920s | -0.119 | 0.4291 | 0.5481 | Russia |
| 1930s | -0.119 | 0.5943 | 0.7133 | Russia |
| 1940s | 0.2669 | 0.821 | 0.5541 | Russia |
| 1950s | 0.5998 | 0.8468 | 0.247 | Russia |
| 1960s | 0.7032 | 0.854 | 0.1508 | Russia |
| 1970s | 1.59 | 0.854 | 0.7367 | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 0.7961 | 1.26 | 0.4633 | Russia |
| 1990s | 1.01 | 1.69 | 0.6804 | Russia |
| 2000s | 1.01 | 1.74 | 0.7294 | Russia |
| 2010s | 1.13 | 1.5 | 0.3746 | Russia |
| 2020s | 1.26 | 1.68 | 0.4192 | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Jamaica or Russia?
- Jamaica, at 1.44 against 1.4 in Russia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Jamaica and Russia?
- 0.04, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Russia?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Jamaica and Russia rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Jamaica ranks 39th and Russia ranks 40th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.