Israel vs Rwanda: Common Good Justifications Score
Israel
1.05
in 2025
Rwanda
1.05
in 2025
Israel rank
69th
Rwanda rank
67th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Israel
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 1.05 against 1.05 in Israel, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 82 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 67th of 175 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.4447 | -2.73 | 3.18 | Israel |
| 1940s | 1.03 | -2.73 | 3.76 | Israel |
| 1950s | 1.03 | -2.73 | 3.76 | Israel |
| 1960s | 1.06 | -0.2736 | 1.34 | Israel |
| 1970s | 1.18 | -0.0672 | 1.24 | Israel |
| 1980s | 1.34 | -0.087 | 1.43 | Israel |
| 1990s | 1.6 | 0.915 | 0.6834 | Israel |
| 2000s | 1.66 | 1.1 | 0.56 | Israel |
| 2010s | 1.76 | 1.38 | 0.3816 | Israel |
| 2020s | 1.57 | 1.31 | 0.2537 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Israel or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 1.05 against 1.05 in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Israel and Rwanda?
- 0, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Rwanda?
- 82 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Rwanda rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Israel ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 67th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.