Israel vs Mauritius: Common Good Justifications Score
Israel
1.05
in 2025
Mauritius
0.934
in 2025
Israel rank
69th
Mauritius rank
72nd
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Israel
- Mauritius
How they compare
Israel currently reports 1.05 against 0.934 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.116.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 98 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 69th and Mauritius ranks 72nd of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 8 and Mauritius in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.291 | -0.735 | 1.03 | Israel |
| 1910s | 0.3525 | -0.735 | 1.09 | Israel |
| 1940s | 1.03 | -0.089 | 1.12 | Israel |
| 1950s | 1.03 | -0.089 | 1.12 | Israel |
| 1960s | 1.06 | 0.2846 | 0.78 | Israel |
| 1970s | 1.18 | 1.78 | 0.6014 | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 1.34 | 1.78 | 0.435 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 1.6 | 1.78 | 0.1806 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1.66 | 1.65 | 0.016 | Israel |
| 2010s | 1.76 | 0.6899 | 1.07 | Israel |
| 2020s | 1.57 | 0.5515 | 1.02 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Israel or Mauritius?
- Israel, at 1.05 against 0.934 in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Israel and Mauritius?
- 0.116, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mauritius?
- 98 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Mauritius rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Israel ranks 69th and Mauritius ranks 72nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.