India vs Jordan: Common Good Justifications Score
India
0.9
in 2025
Jordan
0.882
in 2025
India rank
75th
Jordan rank
77th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- India
- Jordan
How they compare
India currently reports 0.9 against 0.882 in Jordan, a difference of 0.018.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
India ranks 75th and Jordan ranks 77th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, India averaged higher in 8 and Jordan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | -1.8 | -0.598 | 1.2 | Jordan |
| 1930s | -1.8 | -0.598 | 1.2 | Jordan |
| 1940s | -0.9458 | -0.598 | 0.3478 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 2.09 | -0.3444 | 2.43 | India |
| 1960s | 2.09 | -0.281 | 2.37 | India |
| 1970s | 1.98 | -0.281 | 2.27 | India |
| 1980s | 1.91 | -0.281 | 2.19 | India |
| 1990s | 1.91 | -0.1863 | 2.09 | India |
| 2000s | 1.91 | 0.666 | 1.24 | India |
| 2010s | 1.44 | 0.5341 | 0.9066 | India |
| 2020s | 0.8018 | 0.2023 | 0.5995 | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, India or Jordan?
- India, at 0.9 against 0.882 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between India and Jordan?
- 0.018, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Jordan?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do India and Jordan rank globally for common good justifications score?
- India ranks 75th and Jordan ranks 77th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.