Iceland vs Suriname: Common Good Justifications Score
Iceland
1.5
in 2025
Suriname
1.55
in 2025
Iceland rank
34th
Suriname rank
32nd
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Iceland
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 1.55 against 1.5 in Iceland, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 34th and Suriname ranks 32nd of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 11 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.92 | 0.709 | 0.211 | Iceland |
| 1910s | 0.92 | 0.709 | 0.211 | Iceland |
| 1920s | 0.92 | 0.709 | 0.211 | Iceland |
| 1930s | 0.92 | 0.709 | 0.211 | Iceland |
| 1940s | 1.52 | 0.709 | 0.8104 | Iceland |
| 1950s | 1.59 | 0.699 | 0.892 | Iceland |
| 1960s | 1.59 | 0.581 | 1.01 | Iceland |
| 1970s | 1.59 | 0.808 | 0.783 | Iceland |
| 1980s | 1.59 | 1.52 | 0.0712 | Iceland |
| 1990s | 1.59 | 1.76 | 0.1641 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 1.59 | 1.78 | 0.19 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 1.62 | 1.6 | 0.0234 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 1.56 | 1.55 | 0.0155 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Iceland or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 1.55 against 1.5 in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Iceland and Suriname?
- 0.05, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Suriname?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Suriname rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Iceland ranks 34th and Suriname ranks 32nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.