Haiti vs Iran: Common Good Justifications Score
Haiti
0.045
in 2025
Iran
0.032
in 2025
Haiti rank
126th
Iran rank
128th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Haiti
- Iran
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 0.045 against 0.032 in Iran, a difference of 0.013.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.4 times Iran's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 126th and Iran ranks 128th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 5 and Iran in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Iran | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.258 | -1.53 | 1.78 | Haiti |
| 1910s | -0.0452 | -1.65 | 1.6 | Haiti |
| 1920s | -0.5 | -1.65 | 1.15 | Haiti |
| 1930s | -0.5 | -1.65 | 1.15 | Haiti |
| 1940s | -0.5 | -1.07 | 0.5709 | Haiti |
| 1950s | -0.6388 | -0.2042 | 0.4346 | Iran |
| 1960s | -1.19 | -0.7802 | 0.4138 | Iran |
| 1970s | -1.19 | -0.5946 | 0.5994 | Iran |
| 1980s | -0.9462 | 0.9139 | 1.86 | Iran |
| 1990s | 0.045 | 0.8677 | 0.8227 | Iran |
| 2000s | 0.045 | 0.932 | 0.887 | Iran |
| 2010s | 0.045 | 0.7519 | 0.7069 | Iran |
| 2020s | 0.045 | 0.2865 | 0.2415 | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Haiti or Iran?
- Haiti, at 0.045 against 0.032 in Iran as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Haiti and Iran?
- 0.013, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Iran?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Haiti and Iran rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Haiti ranks 126th and Iran ranks 128th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.