Guinea-Bissau vs Romania: Common Good Justifications Score
Guinea-Bissau
0.281
in 2025
Romania
0.28
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
120th
Romania rank
121st
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Romania
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.281 against 0.28 in Romania, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Romania ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 120th and Romania ranks 121st of 175 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -1.97 | 0.363 | 2.33 | Romania |
| 1910s | -1.97 | 0.363 | 2.33 | Romania |
| 1920s | -1.97 | -0.07 | 1.9 | Romania |
| 1930s | -1.97 | -0.298 | 1.67 | Romania |
| 1940s | -1.97 | -0.0489 | 1.92 | Romania |
| 1950s | -1.97 | 0.668 | 2.64 | Romania |
| 1960s | -1.97 | 1.26 | 3.22 | Romania |
| 1970s | -0.0504 | 1.15 | 1.2 | Romania |
| 1980s | 0.0337 | 1.04 | 1 | Romania |
| 1990s | -0.3704 | 2.27 | 2.64 | Romania |
| 2000s | -0.7808 | 1.55 | 2.33 | Romania |
| 2010s | -0.5294 | 1.24 | 1.77 | Romania |
| 2020s | -0.383 | 0.5523 | 0.9353 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Guinea-Bissau or Romania?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0.281 against 0.28 in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Guinea-Bissau and Romania?
- 0.001, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Romania?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Romania rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 120th and Romania ranks 121st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.