Greece vs Montenegro: Common Good Justifications Score
Greece
2.01
in 2025
Montenegro
1.9
in 2025
Greece rank
16th
Montenegro rank
19th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Greece
- Montenegro
How they compare
Greece currently reports 2.01 against 1.9 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.11.
That makes Greece's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 46 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Montenegro ahead.
Greece ranks 16th and Montenegro ranks 19th of 175 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 4 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.065 | 0.414 | 0.349 | Montenegro |
| 1910s | 0.065 | 0.2828 | 0.2177 | Montenegro |
| 1990s | 1.29 | 0.44 | 0.853 | Greece |
| 2000s | 1.29 | 0.59 | 0.6994 | Greece |
| 2010s | 1.67 | 0.5508 | 1.12 | Greece |
| 2020s | 2.19 | 1.67 | 0.5143 | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Greece or Montenegro?
- Greece, at 2.01 against 1.9 in Montenegro as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Greece and Montenegro?
- 0.11, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Montenegro?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Greece and Montenegro rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Greece ranks 16th and Montenegro ranks 19th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.