Gambia vs Moldova: Common Good Justifications Score
Gambia
0.606
in 2025
Moldova
0.661
in 2025
Gambia rank
96th
Moldova rank
93rd
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Gambia
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 0.661 against 0.606 in Gambia, a difference of 0.055.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Moldova ahead.
Gambia ranks 96th and Moldova ranks 93rd of 175 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.212 | 0.052 | 0.264 | Moldova |
| 1910s | -0.212 | 0.0495 | 0.2615 | Moldova |
| 1940s | -0.243 | 0.821 | 1.06 | Moldova |
| 1950s | -0.213 | 0.8468 | 1.06 | Moldova |
| 1960s | 0.0205 | 0.854 | 0.8335 | Moldova |
| 1970s | 0.134 | 0.854 | 0.72 | Moldova |
| 1980s | 0.134 | 1.26 | 1.13 | Moldova |
| 1990s | -0.2886 | 0.2593 | 0.5479 | Moldova |
| 2000s | -0.607 | 0.3406 | 0.9476 | Moldova |
| 2010s | -0.2696 | 0.8136 | 1.08 | Moldova |
| 2020s | 0.606 | 1.19 | 0.5887 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Gambia or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 0.661 against 0.606 in Gambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Gambia and Moldova?
- 0.055, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Moldova?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Gambia and Moldova rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Gambia ranks 96th and Moldova ranks 93rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.