Fiji vs Lebanon: Common Good Justifications Score
Fiji
-0.315
in 2025
Lebanon
-0.273
in 2025
Fiji rank
138th
Lebanon rank
136th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Fiji
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports -0.273 against -0.315 in Fiji, a difference of 0.042.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 138th and Lebanon ranks 136th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 11 and Lebanon in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -0.251 | -0.979 | 0.728 | Fiji |
| 1920s | -0.251 | -0.979 | 0.728 | Fiji |
| 1930s | -0.251 | -0.979 | 0.728 | Fiji |
| 1940s | -0.251 | -1.19 | 0.9436 | Fiji |
| 1950s | 0.1078 | -1.27 | 1.38 | Fiji |
| 1960s | 0.347 | -1.1 | 1.45 | Fiji |
| 1970s | 0.826 | -0.976 | 1.8 | Fiji |
| 1980s | 0.4186 | -1.13 | 1.55 | Fiji |
| 1990s | 0.293 | -0.4446 | 0.7376 | Fiji |
| 2000s | -0.6308 | -0.445 | 0.1858 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 0.0619 | -0.2292 | 0.2911 | Fiji |
| 2020s | -0.1105 | -0.3363 | 0.2258 | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Fiji or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at -0.273 against -0.315 in Fiji as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Fiji and Lebanon?
- 0.042, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Lebanon?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Lebanon rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Fiji ranks 138th and Lebanon ranks 136th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.