Djibouti vs United Arab Emirates: Common Good Justifications Score
Djibouti
-0.384
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
-0.446
in 2025
Djibouti rank
140th
United Arab Emirates rank
142nd
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Djibouti
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports -0.384 against -0.446 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.062.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Djibouti ranks 140th and United Arab Emirates ranks 142nd of 175 regions.
Across the 6 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -2.02 | 0.4961 | 2.52 | United Arab Emirates |
| 1980s | -1.03 | 0.369 | 1.4 | United Arab Emirates |
| 1990s | -0.9245 | 0.369 | 1.29 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2000s | -0.7002 | -0.0887 | 0.6115 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | -0.5338 | -0.446 | 0.0878 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | -0.1757 | -0.446 | 0.2703 | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Djibouti or United Arab Emirates?
- Djibouti, at -0.384 against -0.446 in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Djibouti and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.062, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and United Arab Emirates?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
- How do Djibouti and United Arab Emirates rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Djibouti ranks 140th and United Arab Emirates ranks 142nd of 175 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.