Cyprus vs Libya: Common Good Justifications Score
Cyprus
0.584
in 2025
Libya
0.617
in 2025
Cyprus rank
98th
Libya rank
95th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Cyprus
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.617 against 0.584 in Cyprus, a difference of 0.033.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Cyprus's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 98th and Libya ranks 95th of 175 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 4 and Libya in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | -2.58 | -3.41 | 0.83 | Cyprus |
| 1940s | -2.58 | -3.41 | 0.83 | Cyprus |
| 1950s | -1.97 | 0.206 | 2.18 | Libya |
| 1960s | 0.1143 | 0.2284 | 0.1141 | Libya |
| 1970s | 0.1776 | 0.753 | 0.5754 | Libya |
| 1980s | 0.384 | 0.753 | 0.369 | Libya |
| 1990s | 0.405 | 0.753 | 0.348 | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.7276 | 0.753 | 0.0254 | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.8364 | 0.3291 | 0.5073 | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 1.46 | 0.4367 | 1.02 | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Cyprus or Libya?
- Libya, at 0.617 against 0.584 in Cyprus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Cyprus and Libya?
- 0.033, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Libya?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Cyprus and Libya rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Cyprus ranks 98th and Libya ranks 95th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.