Cuba vs Tunisia: Common Good Justifications Score
Cuba
2.31
in 2025
Tunisia
2.37
in 2025
Cuba rank
10th
Tunisia rank
8th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Cuba
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 2.37 against 2.31 in Cuba, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 124 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 10th and Tunisia ranks 8th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 9 and Tunisia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.393 | -1.33 | 0.939 | Cuba |
| 1910s | -0.393 | -1.33 | 0.939 | Cuba |
| 1920s | -0.4359 | -1.33 | 0.8961 | Cuba |
| 1930s | -0.447 | -1.33 | 0.885 | Cuba |
| 1940s | 0.247 | -1.33 | 1.58 | Cuba |
| 1950s | -0.3262 | 0.4496 | 0.7758 | Tunisia |
| 1960s | 1.62 | 2.82 | 1.2 | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 1.62 | 2.25 | 0.6284 | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 1.62 | 2.06 | 0.4342 | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 1.62 | 1.53 | 0.089 | Cuba |
| 2000s | 1.62 | 0.9402 | 0.6828 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 2.23 | 2.02 | 0.2106 | Cuba |
| 2020s | 2.42 | 2.37 | 0.0518 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Cuba or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 2.37 against 2.31 in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Cuba and Tunisia?
- 0.06, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Tunisia?
- 124 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Tunisia rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Cuba ranks 10th and Tunisia ranks 8th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.