Cuba vs Seychelles: Common Good Justifications Score
Cuba
2.31
in 2025
Seychelles
2.14
in 2025
Cuba rank
10th
Seychelles rank
12th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Cuba
- Seychelles
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 2.31 against 2.14 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.17.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Seychelles's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 123 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 10th and Seychelles ranks 12th of 175 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.393 | -2.43 | 2.03 | Cuba |
| 1910s | -0.393 | -2.43 | 2.04 | Cuba |
| 1920s | -0.4359 | -2.43 | 1.99 | Cuba |
| 1930s | -0.447 | -2.43 | 1.98 | Cuba |
| 1940s | 0.247 | -1.91 | 2.16 | Cuba |
| 1950s | -0.3262 | -0.499 | 0.1728 | Cuba |
| 1960s | 1.62 | -0.499 | 2.12 | Cuba |
| 1970s | 1.62 | -0.0496 | 1.67 | Cuba |
| 1980s | 1.62 | 0.215 | 1.41 | Cuba |
| 1990s | 1.62 | 0.4663 | 1.16 | Cuba |
| 2000s | 1.62 | 0.5487 | 1.07 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 2.23 | 0.676 | 1.55 | Cuba |
| 2020s | 2.42 | 1.76 | 0.6575 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Cuba or Seychelles?
- Cuba, at 2.31 against 2.14 in Seychelles as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Cuba and Seychelles?
- 0.17, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Seychelles?
- 123 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Seychelles rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Cuba ranks 10th and Seychelles ranks 12th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.