Croatia vs Mozambique: Common Good Justifications Score
Croatia
1.27
in 2025
Mozambique
1.27
in 2025
Croatia rank
45th
Mozambique rank
46th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Croatia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 1.27 against 1.27 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Mozambique ahead.
Croatia ranks 45th and Mozambique ranks 46th of 175 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -2.04 | -0.329 | 1.71 | Mozambique |
| 1950s | -1.6 | -0.329 | 1.27 | Mozambique |
| 1960s | -1.21 | -0.329 | 0.878 | Mozambique |
| 1970s | -1.21 | -0.093 | 1.11 | Mozambique |
| 1980s | -1.21 | 0.0968 | 1.3 | Mozambique |
| 1990s | 0.1645 | 0.8011 | 0.6366 | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 1.16 | 1.36 | 0.1985 | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 0.9489 | 1.14 | 0.1873 | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 0.8582 | 1.23 | 0.3697 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Croatia or Mozambique?
- Croatia, at 1.27 against 1.27 in Mozambique as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Croatia and Mozambique?
- 0, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Mozambique?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Mozambique rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Croatia ranks 45th and Mozambique ranks 46th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.