Croatia vs Georgia: Common Good Justifications Score
Croatia
1.27
in 2025
Georgia
1.32
in 2025
Croatia rank
45th
Georgia rank
42nd
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Croatia
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 1.32 against 1.27 in Croatia, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Georgia ahead.
Croatia ranks 45th and Georgia ranks 42nd of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -2.04 | 0.836 | 2.88 | Georgia |
| 1950s | -1.6 | 0.8468 | 2.45 | Georgia |
| 1960s | -1.21 | 0.854 | 2.06 | Georgia |
| 1970s | -1.21 | 0.854 | 2.06 | Georgia |
| 1980s | -1.21 | 1.26 | 2.47 | Georgia |
| 1990s | 0.1645 | 0.3234 | 0.1589 | Georgia |
| 2000s | 1.16 | 0.6088 | 0.5507 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.9489 | 1.1 | 0.1544 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.8582 | 1.58 | 0.7217 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Croatia or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 1.32 against 1.27 in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Croatia and Georgia?
- 0.05, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Georgia?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Georgia rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Croatia ranks 45th and Georgia ranks 42nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.