Comoros vs Saudi Arabia: Common Good Justifications Score
Comoros
-0.622
in 2025
Saudi Arabia
-0.754
in 2025
Comoros rank
147th
Saudi Arabia rank
148th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Comoros
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Comoros currently reports -0.622 against -0.754 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.132.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Comoros ranks 147th and Saudi Arabia ranks 148th of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 6 and Saudi Arabia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -2.78 | -1.26 | 1.51 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1950s | -2.56 | -1.26 | 1.29 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1960s | -1.68 | -1.26 | 0.4136 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1970s | -0.7838 | -1.26 | 0.4802 | Comoros |
| 1980s | -0.688 | -1.26 | 0.576 | Comoros |
| 1990s | 0.264 | -1.26 | 1.53 | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.1915 | -1.26 | 1.46 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.267 | -1.19 | 1.46 | Comoros |
| 2020s | -0.4487 | -0.8275 | 0.3788 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Comoros or Saudi Arabia?
- Comoros, at -0.622 against -0.754 in Saudi Arabia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Comoros and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.132, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Saudi Arabia?
- 80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Saudi Arabia rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Comoros ranks 147th and Saudi Arabia ranks 148th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.