Chad vs Eritrea: Common Good Justifications Score
Chad
-1.44
in 2025
Eritrea
-1.61
in 2025
Chad rank
162nd
Eritrea rank
165th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Chad
- Eritrea
How they compare
Chad currently reports -1.44 against -1.61 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.17.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Eritrea ahead.
Chad ranks 162nd and Eritrea ranks 165th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 5 and Eritrea in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | -3.69 | -2.68 | 1.02 | Eritrea |
| 1930s | -3.69 | -3.09 | 0.6018 | Eritrea |
| 1940s | -3.15 | -0.9334 | 2.21 | Eritrea |
| 1950s | -2.6 | -0.9723 | 1.63 | Eritrea |
| 1960s | -1.53 | -1.34 | 0.1878 | Eritrea |
| 1970s | -2.1 | -2.38 | 0.2832 | Chad |
| 1980s | -2.63 | -2.78 | 0.1436 | Chad |
| 1990s | -1.41 | -1.25 | 0.1537 | Eritrea |
| 2000s | -1.43 | -1.6 | 0.1713 | Chad |
| 2010s | -1.42 | -1.59 | 0.169 | Chad |
| 2020s | -1.22 | -1.4 | 0.1737 | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Chad or Eritrea?
- Chad, at -1.44 against -1.61 in Eritrea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Chad and Eritrea?
- 0.17, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eritrea?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Eritrea rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Chad ranks 162nd and Eritrea ranks 165th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.