Central African Republic vs Yemen: Common Good Justifications Score

Central African Republic
-1.94
in 2025
Yemen
-2.06
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
167th
Yemen rank
169th

Common Good Justifications Score over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Yemen
-3-2-101190019622025

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports -1.94 against -2.06 in Yemen, a difference of 0.12.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 167th and Yemen ranks 169th of 175 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Yemen Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5152 -0.4381 0.9533 Central African Republic
2000s 0.1716 -0.5252 0.6968 Central African Republic
2010s -0.3764 -1.34 0.9649 Central African Republic
2020s -0.898 -2.27 1.37 Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher common good justifications score, Central African Republic or Yemen?
Central African Republic, at -1.94 against -2.06 in Yemen as of 2025.
What is the difference in common good justifications score between Central African Republic and Yemen?
0.12, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Yemen?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Central African Republic and Yemen rank globally for common good justifications score?
Central African Republic ranks 167th and Yemen ranks 169th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Common Good Justifications Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.