Canada vs Mali: Common Good Justifications Score
Canada
1.48
in 2025
Mali
1.45
in 2025
Canada rank
36th
Mali rank
38th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Canada
- Mali
How they compare
Canada currently reports 1.48 against 1.45 in Mali, a difference of 0.03.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 36th and Mali ranks 38th of 175 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 1.44 | -3.3 | 4.74 | Canada |
| 1910s | 1.53 | -3.3 | 4.83 | Canada |
| 1920s | 1.34 | -3.3 | 4.64 | Canada |
| 1930s | 1.39 | -3.3 | 4.69 | Canada |
| 1940s | 1.56 | -2.78 | 4.34 | Canada |
| 1950s | 1.42 | -1.99 | 3.41 | Canada |
| 1960s | 1.97 | 0.4509 | 1.52 | Canada |
| 1970s | 1.8 | -0.678 | 2.48 | Canada |
| 1980s | 1.7 | -0.678 | 2.38 | Canada |
| 1990s | 1.65 | 0.6669 | 0.9831 | Canada |
| 2000s | 1.51 | 0.9368 | 0.571 | Canada |
| 2010s | 1.44 | 0.9876 | 0.4555 | Canada |
| 2020s | 1.48 | 1.22 | 0.2572 | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Canada or Mali?
- Canada, at 1.48 against 1.45 in Mali as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Canada and Mali?
- 0.03, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Mali?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Canada and Mali rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Canada ranks 36th and Mali ranks 38th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.