Cambodia vs Sudan: Common Good Justifications Score
Cambodia
-2.2
in 2025
Sudan
-2.38
in 2025
Cambodia rank
170th
Sudan rank
172nd
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Cambodia
- Sudan
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports -2.2 against -2.38 in Sudan, a difference of 0.18.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Sudan ahead.
Cambodia ranks 170th and Sudan ranks 172nd of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Sudan in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -3.49 | -3.11 | 0.382 | Sudan |
| 1910s | -3.49 | -3.11 | 0.382 | Sudan |
| 1920s | -3.49 | -3.11 | 0.382 | Sudan |
| 1930s | -3.49 | -3.11 | 0.382 | Sudan |
| 1940s | -3.49 | -3.11 | 0.382 | Sudan |
| 1950s | -1.84 | -1.19 | 0.6514 | Sudan |
| 1960s | -0.6206 | -0.0738 | 0.5468 | Sudan |
| 1970s | -2.48 | -0.26 | 2.22 | Sudan |
| 1980s | -1.95 | -0.1051 | 1.85 | Sudan |
| 1990s | -1.01 | -0.259 | 0.7524 | Sudan |
| 2000s | -0.5958 | -0.9512 | 0.3554 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | -1.04 | -1.33 | 0.2851 | Cambodia |
| 2020s | -2.2 | -1.42 | 0.7832 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Cambodia or Sudan?
- Cambodia, at -2.2 against -2.38 in Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Cambodia and Sudan?
- 0.18, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Sudan?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Sudan rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Cambodia ranks 170th and Sudan ranks 172nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.