Cape Verde vs Germany: Common Good Justifications Score
Cape Verde
1.84
in 2025
Germany
1.8
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
20th
Germany rank
22nd
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Cape Verde
- Germany
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 1.84 against 1.8 in Germany, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Germany ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 20th and Germany ranks 22nd of 175 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Germany in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -2.43 | -0.257 | 2.17 | Germany |
| 1910s | -2.43 | -0.1395 | 2.29 | Germany |
| 1920s | -2.43 | 0.343 | 2.77 | Germany |
| 1930s | -2.43 | -0.4696 | 1.96 | Germany |
| 1940s | -2.43 | -0.878 | 1.55 | Germany |
| 1990s | 1.49 | 2.03 | 0.548 | Germany |
| 2000s | 1.49 | 2.03 | 0.548 | Germany |
| 2010s | 1.79 | 1.96 | 0.168 | Germany |
| 2020s | 1.94 | 1.8 | 0.1367 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Cape Verde or Germany?
- Cape Verde, at 1.84 against 1.8 in Germany as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Cape Verde and Germany?
- 0.04, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Germany?
- 80 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Germany rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Cape Verde ranks 20th and Germany ranks 22nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.