Belarus vs Tajikistan: Common Good Justifications Score
Belarus
1.52
in 2025
Tajikistan
1.48
in 2025
Belarus rank
33rd
Tajikistan rank
35th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Belarus
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1.52 against 1.48 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Belarus ranks 33rd and Tajikistan ranks 35th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.052 | 0.052 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.0495 | 0.0495 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0.4291 | 0.4291 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0.5943 | 0.5943 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.821 | 0.821 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.8468 | 0.8468 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.854 | 0.854 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0.854 | 0.854 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1.07 | 1.16 | 0.092 | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 2 | 0.799 | 1.2 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1.9 | 0.5623 | 1.34 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 1.13 | 0.6457 | 0.4863 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Belarus or Tajikistan?
- Belarus, at 1.52 against 1.48 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Belarus and Tajikistan?
- 0.04, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tajikistan?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Tajikistan rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Belarus ranks 33rd and Tajikistan ranks 35th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.