Bahrain vs Chad: Common Good Justifications Score
Bahrain
-1.39
in 2025
Chad
-1.44
in 2025
Bahrain rank
160th
Chad rank
162nd
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Bahrain
- Chad
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports -1.39 against -1.44 in Chad, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Bahrain ahead.
Bahrain ranks 160th and Chad ranks 162nd of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 9 and Chad in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | -1.56 | -3.69 | 2.13 | Bahrain |
| 1930s | -0.958 | -3.69 | 2.73 | Bahrain |
| 1940s | -0.958 | -3.15 | 2.19 | Bahrain |
| 1950s | -0.958 | -2.6 | 1.64 | Bahrain |
| 1960s | -0.958 | -1.53 | 0.5712 | Bahrain |
| 1970s | 1.06 | -2.1 | 3.16 | Bahrain |
| 1980s | -0.927 | -2.63 | 1.71 | Bahrain |
| 1990s | -0.927 | -1.41 | 0.4784 | Bahrain |
| 2000s | -0.7308 | -1.43 | 0.6989 | Bahrain |
| 2010s | -1.49 | -1.42 | 0.0702 | Chad |
| 2020s | -1.39 | -1.22 | 0.1693 | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Bahrain or Chad?
- Bahrain, at -1.39 against -1.44 in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Bahrain and Chad?
- 0.05, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Chad?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
- How do Bahrain and Chad rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Bahrain ranks 160th and Chad ranks 162nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.