Australia vs Zambia: Common Good Justifications Score
Australia
1.55
in 2025
Zambia
1.58
in 2025
Australia rank
31st
Zambia rank
29th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Australia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 1.58 against 1.55 in Australia, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 31st and Zambia ranks 29th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 10 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 1.41 | -1.96 | 3.38 | Australia |
| 1920s | 1.41 | -1.96 | 3.38 | Australia |
| 1930s | 1.41 | -1.96 | 3.38 | Australia |
| 1940s | 1.41 | -1.96 | 3.38 | Australia |
| 1950s | 1.41 | -1.96 | 3.38 | Australia |
| 1960s | 1.41 | -0.311 | 1.73 | Australia |
| 1970s | 1.41 | 1.08 | 0.332 | Australia |
| 1980s | 1.41 | 1.25 | 0.168 | Australia |
| 1990s | 1.41 | 2.1 | 0.6868 | Zambia |
| 2000s | 1.43 | 2.44 | 1.01 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 1.4 | 0.79 | 0.6066 | Australia |
| 2020s | 1.43 | 1.05 | 0.3828 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Australia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 1.58 against 1.55 in Australia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Australia and Zambia?
- 0.03, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zambia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Zambia rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Australia ranks 31st and Zambia ranks 29th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.