Australia vs Belarus: Common Good Justifications Score
Australia
1.55
in 2025
Belarus
1.52
in 2025
Australia rank
31st
Belarus rank
33rd
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Australia
- Belarus
How they compare
Australia currently reports 1.55 against 1.52 in Belarus, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 125 shared years of data; in 1901 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 31st and Belarus ranks 33rd of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 11 and Belarus in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 1.41 | 0.052 | 1.36 | Australia |
| 1910s | 1.41 | 0.0495 | 1.36 | Australia |
| 1920s | 1.41 | 0.4291 | 0.9849 | Australia |
| 1930s | 1.41 | 0.5943 | 0.8197 | Australia |
| 1940s | 1.41 | 0.821 | 0.593 | Australia |
| 1950s | 1.41 | 0.8468 | 0.5672 | Australia |
| 1960s | 1.41 | 0.854 | 0.56 | Australia |
| 1970s | 1.41 | 0.854 | 0.56 | Australia |
| 1980s | 1.41 | 1.26 | 0.1546 | Australia |
| 1990s | 1.41 | 1.07 | 0.3452 | Australia |
| 2000s | 1.43 | 2 | 0.5698 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1.4 | 1.9 | 0.5014 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 1.43 | 1.13 | 0.2973 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Australia or Belarus?
- Australia, at 1.55 against 1.52 in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Australia and Belarus?
- 0.03, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belarus?
- 125 years are reported by both, from 1901 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Belarus rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Australia ranks 31st and Belarus ranks 33rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.