Armenia vs Japan: Common Good Justifications Score
Armenia
0.945
in 2025
Japan
1.05
in 2025
Armenia rank
71st
Japan rank
68th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Armenia
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 1.05 against 0.945 in Armenia, a difference of 0.105.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Japan ahead.
Armenia ranks 71st and Japan ranks 68th of 175 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Japan in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.015 | 0.949 | 0.934 | Japan |
| 1920s | 0.4291 | 0.949 | 0.5199 | Japan |
| 1930s | 0.5943 | 0.949 | 0.3547 | Japan |
| 1940s | 0.821 | 0.991 | 0.17 | Japan |
| 1950s | 0.8468 | 1.12 | 0.2708 | Japan |
| 1960s | 0.854 | 1.21 | 0.359 | Japan |
| 1970s | 0.854 | 1.21 | 0.359 | Japan |
| 1980s | 1.26 | 1.42 | 0.1566 | Japan |
| 1990s | 0.9753 | 1.26 | 0.2817 | Japan |
| 2000s | 1.17 | 1.15 | 0.0194 | Armenia |
| 2010s | 1.54 | 1.16 | 0.3789 | Armenia |
| 2020s | 1.97 | 1.05 | 0.9167 | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Armenia or Japan?
- Japan, at 1.05 against 0.945 in Armenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Armenia and Japan?
- 0.105, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Japan?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Armenia and Japan rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Armenia ranks 71st and Japan ranks 68th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.