Argentina vs Moldova: Common Good Justifications Score
Argentina
0.7
in 2025
Moldova
0.661
in 2025
Argentina rank
90th
Moldova rank
93rd
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Argentina
- Moldova
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 0.7 against 0.661 in Moldova, a difference of 0.039.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Moldova ahead.
Argentina ranks 90th and Moldova ranks 93rd of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 5 and Moldova in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.181 | 0.052 | 0.233 | Moldova |
| 1910s | 0.239 | 0.0495 | 0.1895 | Argentina |
| 1940s | -0.0823 | 0.821 | 0.9033 | Moldova |
| 1950s | -0.1964 | 0.8468 | 1.04 | Moldova |
| 1960s | -0.3292 | 0.854 | 1.18 | Moldova |
| 1970s | -0.0079 | 0.854 | 0.8619 | Moldova |
| 1980s | 0.4489 | 1.26 | 0.8105 | Moldova |
| 1990s | 0.9896 | 0.2593 | 0.7303 | Argentina |
| 2000s | 0.8661 | 0.3406 | 0.5255 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 1.17 | 0.8136 | 0.3585 | Argentina |
| 2020s | 1.24 | 1.19 | 0.0463 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Argentina or Moldova?
- Argentina, at 0.7 against 0.661 in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Argentina and Moldova?
- 0.039, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Moldova?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Argentina and Moldova rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Argentina ranks 90th and Moldova ranks 93rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.