Angola vs Maldives: Common Good Justifications Score
Angola
0.917
in 2025
Maldives
0.907
in 2025
Angola rank
73rd
Maldives rank
74th
Common Good Justifications Score over time
- Angola
- Maldives
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0.917 against 0.907 in Maldives, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 73rd and Maldives ranks 74th of 175 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 11 and Maldives in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -1.23 | -3.19 | 1.95 | Angola |
| 1910s | -1.23 | -3.19 | 1.95 | Angola |
| 1920s | -1.23 | -3.19 | 1.95 | Angola |
| 1930s | -1.23 | -2.14 | 0.9068 | Angola |
| 1940s | -1.23 | -1.88 | 0.645 | Angola |
| 1950s | -1.23 | -1.88 | 0.645 | Angola |
| 1960s | -1.23 | -2.13 | 0.8958 | Angola |
| 1970s | -0.344 | -2.97 | 2.63 | Angola |
| 1980s | 0.5 | -1.53 | 2.03 | Angola |
| 1990s | 0.6753 | -1.53 | 2.21 | Angola |
| 2000s | 0.6898 | -0.5414 | 1.23 | Angola |
| 2010s | 0.7228 | 0.7658 | 0.043 | Maldives |
| 2020s | 0.917 | 1.38 | 0.4663 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher common good justifications score, Angola or Maldives?
- Angola, at 0.917 against 0.907 in Maldives as of 2025.
- What is the difference in common good justifications score between Angola and Maldives?
- 0.01, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Maldives?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Maldives rank globally for common good justifications score?
- Angola ranks 73rd and Maldives ranks 74th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.